Spiritual Sobriety in 2026

There have been times in history when speaking from one’s deepest convictions came at an unbearable cost. People like Marguerite Porete, Yeshua, and Joan of Arc were not dangerous because they sought power, but because they pointed to an authority that could not be controlled. Each, in their own way, spoke from an interior clarity that bypassed institutions, intermediaries, and sanctioned belief. And for that, they paid with their lives.

Today, many of us live with a privilege they did not have: the ability to speak honestly from the heart and soul without immediate, physical repercussion. That freedom matters. And it carries responsibility.

Because the question is no longer whether we are allowed to speak — but how we speak, and from where.

As we watch the actions of political leaders, institutions, and systems — here in the United States and across the world — it’s easy to feel the ground shifting. The forces at play are complex, layered, and often opaque. Most people don’t have the time, energy, or desire to fully understand them. What follows instead are knee-jerk reactions: outrage, fear, certainty, allegiance, rejection. Not because people are unintelligent or unkind, but because overwhelmed nervous systems seek relief through quick conclusions.

If this moment is an early signal of what lies ahead, then sobriety — of all kinds — will be essential.

And by sobriety, I don’t mean moral superiority or restraint for its own sake. I mean something far more practical and humane.

If we cannot stay clear, regulated, and rooted in ourselves, we will be easily moved — by fear, by outrage, by identity, by narrative.

Sobriety here isn’t moral.
It’s nervous-system-level discernment.

It looks like:

  • Emotional sobriety — not being hijacked by every surge of feeling

  • Informational sobriety — not consuming endlessly in the name of staying “informed”

  • Spiritual sobriety — not intoxicating ourselves with belief, certainty, or transcendence

  • Relational sobriety — not outsourcing authority to leaders, teachers, or tribes

  • Civic sobriety — not reacting faster than we can think, feel, and sense

This is not withdrawal from the world.
It is mature participation in it.

History shows us that inner clarity has always unsettled external power. What’s different now is that many of us can speak without being burned at the stake or silenced by force. That doesn’t mean the work is less important — it means the work has changed.

What is being asked of us now is not heroism, martyrdom, or proclamation.
It is steadiness.

To speak from a place that is regulated enough to see clearly.
To love without collapsing or performing.
To witness without consuming the noise.
To engage without losing ourselves.

Spiritual sobriety does not demand that we believe anything new.
It asks us to return to ourselves clear enough to stay.

And if we are fortunate enough to have a voice in this moment — to speak without immediate repercussion — then perhaps the most ethical use of that voice is not volume, but clarity.

Not reaction, but presence.
Not certainty, but discernment.

That kind of sobriety has carried truth through every age.
And it may be what carries us through this one.

Previous
Previous

Spiritual Sobriety, Part II Love vs. love

Next
Next

On Integration, Imagination, and the Maturation of Voice